Investigation of Misappropriation of Papua Special Autonomy Funds

 

The Indonesian Police have begun coordinating with relevant agencies regarding allegations of mismanagement of Papua Special Autonomy budget funds. Head of the Public Information Bureau of the Public Relations Division of the Police Headquarters, Brigadier General Rusdi Hartono said the Police would coordinate with relevant agencies to resolve these problems. However, Rusdi did not explain in more detail about what agencies the Police would collaborate with.

Previously, the head of the Bureau of Analysts at the National Police Security Intelligence Agency, Brigadier General Achmad Kartiko, found allegations of mismanagement of Papua's Special Autonomy funds. Achmad said the government, in fact, had disbursed Rp. 93 trillion for Papua and Rp. 33 trillion for West Papua. However, there were budget irregularities that were found by his party in managing the Special Autonomy fund.

Achmad said the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) had found waste and ineffective use in budget management. In addition, there have also been mark ups in the procurement of a number of public facilities.

Based on these findings, the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Mahfud MD promised to investigate immediately. He has called a number of agencies to follow up on this matter.

Responding to this, the Papuan people who are members of the Harmony of Papuans in East Java support the second volume of Special Autonomy (Otsus) in Papua. The support was stated because the people of Papua and West Papua felt the benefits of the first volume of special autonomy, although improvements were needed so that the benefits were more optimal.

 

"Otsus Volume I has provided real benefits for the people of Papua, therefore improving Otsus is very important so that its benefits are more optimal"

 

Support for the second volume of Special Autonomy was conveyed by members of the Papuan Silaturrahmi Harmony in Surabaya, East Java, on Tuesday, February 23, 2021. There were five points expressed in their statement of stance. First, support the implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua Volume II in the context of accelerating the development and welfare of the people in Papua and West Papua.

Second, Special Autonomy for Papua Volume II is a government program that must be supported in order to improve education, health, economy and infrastructure development, so that Papua becomes a developed province and is equal to other regions in Indonesia. Third, provincial and district governments throughout Papua are asked to be professional and transparent in the management of the second special autonomy fund.

Fourth, encourage the government to immediately audit the first volume of Papua's Otsus program so that the Papuan people can know whether the use of their funds is right on target or not. Fifth, to urge the central government to form an independent institution for assistance and supervision of the second volume of the Papua Special Autonomy program so that its distribution is really on target.

Papuan elder Robert Y Korea said that Otsus must be supported because this is a government program that must be implemented, although he considers that most Papuans have not experienced it directly.

The same thing was conveyed by a Papuan elder from Biak, Freek Christian. He said that Otsus is very important and very helpful for the people in Papua, where all of them feel that everything is from Otsus. However, perhaps in its implementation, it is hoped that it can be reached by the small community in remote areas of Papua.

 

Rumbiak M. 

Papuan Observer

The Expansion of the Papua Region Must Be for The Welfare of The Papuan People, Not for The Political Elite

 

                                                            Photo: Tribun-papua.com

The government plans to revise Law Number 21 Year 2001 regarding Special Autonomy (Otsus) for Papua. Two points will be discussed, namely the sustainability of the Special Autonomy Fund and the expansion of the Papua region.

Member of Commission I DPR Sukamta expressed his support for the government's plan to expand the Papua region. According to him, the expansion plan must have an impact on improving the welfare, quality of life, education and health of Indigenous Papuans (OAP).

The Deputy Chairperson of the PKS Faction for Politics, Law and Human Rights said that the expansion should be able to increase the Human Development Index (IPM) of Papua and West Papua, which is currently below the national HDI average every year.

Sukamta added that during the 20 years of the implementation of Papua's Special Autonomy, the central government was impressed that it only provided funds from the center to the regions, then allowed these funds to be managed freely by the regional governments of Papua and West Papua.

Ironically, more of the special autonomy funds are allocated for government bureaucratic expenditures such as personnel spending, goods and services expenditures. Meanwhile, the need for public services that touch the people directly is minimal and does not work well.

In particular, he emphasized that special autonomy should prioritize the main subject, namely Orang Asli Papua (OAP). OAP feels increasingly marginalized by the presence of migrants from various regions in Indonesia. This is a serious problem and the government must solve it.

 

“The Papuan human development approach must be focused on OAP who have felt marginalized, marginalized, inferior and just feel used”

 

Sukamta is of the opinion that the problem of expansion and the special autonomy fund is only a method or means.

Meanwhile, the target, plan for completion, implementation, monitoring and evaluation must be carried out properly and strictly so that the failure of the special autonomy fund and regional expansion is not repeated.

The legislator from the Yogyakarta electoral district reminded the government that the approach in Papua must touch the root of the Papuan problem. Namely discrimination and racism, development in Papua that raises the welfare of indigenous Papuans, human rights violations, as well as matters of the status and political history of Papua.

 

Arnold Lukas

Papuan Observer